2009年9月30日星期三

人生是一种承受

人生是一种承受

需要学会支撑 支撑事业 支撑家庭 甚至支撑起整个社会

有支撑就一定会有承受 支撑起多少重量 就要承受多大压力 从某种意义上说 生活本身就是一种承受

  承受痛苦~人生而言就是痛苦, 痛苦常常扮演着不速之客的角色 ,往往会不请自来, 有些痛苦来得温柔,如同漫漫降临的黄昏,在不知不觉间你会感到冰冷和黑暗,有些痛苦来的突然,如同一阵暴雨狂风, 让我们来不急防范 当我们屈服于痛苦的时候 他可能使我们哑口无言,甚至在绝望中走向灭亡,当我们承受了痛苦,我们就会变的坚强自信,那么痛苦就变成了一笔物价的财富。

  承受幸福~幸福需要享受,但有时候幸福也会轻而易举的击败一个人,当幸福突然来临的时候 人们往往会被幸福的旋涡淹没,从幸福中忘记了一切, 承受幸福,就是要珍视幸福而不是一味的沉淀其中,如同面对一坛陈年老酒,一饮而尽往往只会烂醉如泥不省人事,只有慢慢品尝,才会品出真正的香醇甜美。

  承受平淡~人生中除了幸福和痛苦,平淡占据了我们生活的大部分生活,承受平淡同样需要一份坚毅和耐心,平淡如同一杯清茶,点缀着生活的宁静和温馨,在平淡的生活中,我们需要承受淡淡的孤寂与失落,承受挥之不去的枯燥与沉寂,还要承受遥遥无期的等待与无奈。

  承受孤独~会使我们倍加珍惜友谊承受失败 会使我们的信心更加坚定与深厚.

承受责任~会使我们体会到诚实与崇高.

我认为学会以上的几种承受,会使我们的人生就达到了一定的承认!!

2009年9月24日星期四

船之旅

世上不会有坦直的河流。弯曲、喑礁、浅滩或崖壁之阻,湍急、浑浊、暴风骤雨、或蓝天睛朗曙光熹微。水波上的舟船之旅,或扬帆、或摇橹、或拉纤、或遇狂涛之击,或处于抛锚时刻的泊岸之喜。起点、终点;终点、又是起点。其实,人生之旅何尝不是这样?码头、驿站、沙岸、桥堡、野店,始于此,却不知最终将泊于何处,这比之行船,前程更邈远也更壮阔,酸甜苦辣,在人的生命的全程中,会因此而融入种种动人的情节,也都是一部难尽其说的小说。我有一首题为《樯帆》的小诗这样写到:一旦投入江河,便是波涛的一生。

作为船,即已投入江河(正如人生一旦诞生于世间),处在波涛之上,不进则退,不浮便沉,你是走也走不了,离也离不开,摆也摆不脱的。出世(如当和尚、尼姑、或入修道院)也还在世,在世则难隐于世超脱于世。既立于世,便有饥寒之苦、灾险之虞以及生之情欲和生存空间强加的种种骚扰和苦恼(如蚊蝇之害、污染侵浸、人为的一种迫压与嫉妒等)。既投入洪流,即使不奋力而进,也是绝难回避波澜的冲荡而不得不随波漂泊,无论所选择的是何样的一种方式,而在漂泊过程中,触礁之难、搁浅之困,也都是有可能遭遇的。于是,“平安是福”,“喝粥的生涯是平安”便成为一些人行船行为中的一种安身立命的避世心态了。这便是,该回避的回避,该宽容的宽容,该忍耐的忍耐,该出手时不出手,其实,这也只能在某种平和时期缓冲一下在生之旅的波涛上所面对的矛盾,祸兮祸兮,命运,并不完全操纵在“水手”的手里。

人,在任何时刻都是用希望支撑自己的前进之帆的。奢望,则往往会让人以失望终,而期盼,是怂恿也是督促。但遗憾的是:

时间到了,船还尚未到岸。

人在死时,尚未泊靠自己期盼的岸,这大概是人的一生最大的遗憾与痛苦了。这岸,若是私欲的混合体,这种遗憾当会是一种低下品格的显示。不过,若果指的是人的智慧、奉献与一种崇高的追求,我想,只要他己殚尽己力并无愧于人类,在任何一次跋涉的步履中倒下,都会成为他的岸。

2009年9月10日星期四

证人声称遭十多名官员施酷刑 指责雪反贪会副总监准许逼供

证人声称遭十多名官员施酷刑
指责雪反贪会副总监准许逼供

王德齐
9月9日
下午 3点44分

向警方投报遭受反贪会官员施加“七大酷刑”的西华尼申(T Sivanesan,右图),今日在赵明福验尸庭公开叙述他在去年9月4日至9日,被扣留在雪州反贪会沙亚南商业广场14楼办公室期间,所蒙受的痛苦经历。

他声称,他於首两天的夜里,在一间房间内遭到10至15名名反贪会官员的拳打脚踢,其中两人更是手持藤条和报纸包着的铁棒,来殴打其手脚、屁股和私处。

指阿斯拉夫以藤条打私处


现年22岁的西华尼申也透露,该名使用3尺半长的藤条来殴打其私处和脚板的官员,名字叫作阿斯拉夫(Ashraf)。

据赵家律师哥宾星表示,这名阿斯拉夫相信就是验尸庭的第19名证人,雪州反贪会官员莫哈末阿斯拉夫(Mohd Ashraf Mohd Yunus)。

西华尼申更指责,在10多名反贪会官员围殴他的首个晚上,雪州反贪会副总监也曾进入房间内,并且示意官员继续殴打他逼供。不过,他在作证时并没有披露副总监的名字。

赵家律师哥宾星是於8月28日盘问阿斯拉夫时,向验尸庭提呈西华尼申於去年9月11日投报的报案书,指控雪州反贪会官员涉嫌在沙亚南商业广场14楼办公室,以7大酷刑虐待证人或嫌犯逼供,并质疑赵明福生前也面对一样的遭遇。

根据报案书,有关精神和生理折磨就包括:

(一)官员轮流刮证人的耳光;

(二)用布遮住证人的眼睛;

(三)指示证人脱光衣服;

(四)以报纸包住铁棒,殴打证人的肚子、臀部和手脚;

(五)用脚踢证人的肚子;

(六)用藤条鞭打私处和脚,导致证人几乎晕倒;

(七)对私处施加的其他私刑。

恐吓反贪会将变成“地狱”


目前在一家私人公司担任助理经理的西华尼申,今日在哥宾星引导下供证时,也详细描述反贪会官员如何动用私刑来逼供。

他指出,3名身穿便衣的反贪会官员祖基菲(Zulkifli)、阿斯拉夫,以及一名被称为“J”的人士,是在9月4日下午到其住家,要求他跟随他们返回办公室协助调查。唯这3名官员当时没有逮捕他。

当他们抵达雪州反贪会位于沙亚南商业广场14楼的办公室时,他即被带入一间房间里面。一个名叫莫翰(Mohan)的官员当时以淡米尔话恐吓他说,如果不说真话,那么这里就会变成“地狱”。

接着在晚上7点,3名官员又带来逮捕令和扣留令要求他签名,但他却拒绝服从,并反问官员之前只是要求他来协助调查。结果,他们随即使用手铐来铐住他,尽管他尝试挣扎,但最终还是被反手铐住。

“J”随后在晚上11点将他带回家中搜索,然后於午夜12点再返回沙亚南商业广场14楼办公室。这时,他即被10至15名官员带往一间房间。

粗俗字眼辱骂,毛巾绑眼


西华尼申表示,一名戴着眼镜的高个子官员,当时就使用报纸包住一个铁棒,然后放在一旁,并用手刮其耳光5至6次。这名官员也要求他签署扣留令,不过他却坚持拒绝,结果有关官员即要求脱去所有衣服,只剩下底裤。

“随后,10多名官员即开始拳殴脚踢。这名官员也使用铁棒殴打我全身,大多数是打屁股。”

他指出,阿斯拉夫随后进来房间,并且使用粗俗字眼和“黑吉令”(keling hitam)来辱骂他,同时刮其耳光大约5次。

不过,他还是拒绝签署扣留令,接着阿斯拉夫便用手铐来铐住他的脚,并且使用藤条来殴打其私处。

尽管他尝试在地上挣扎,不过阿斯拉夫还是把他转过身来殴打,甚至使用一条写着反贪污局的毛巾来绑住其眼睛。

被毒打20分钟后不省人事


受询及现场是否有其他官员,西华尼申则回答说,阿斯拉夫进来时曾经阻止官员围殴,并要求他穿回衣服,因为雪州副总监正在途中。

“不过,副总监进来后却示意他们继续脱掉衣服殴打,并表示无须害怕。”

他表示,本身被毒打20分钟后即不省人事,直到清晨5点30分至6点左右才起来,并且发现有人使用塑胶袋包着一块冰,放进他的底裤前部。

他也透露,这群殴打他的官员包括阿斯拉夫、凯鲁尼赞和沙齐。至于其他官员,他并不知道他们的名字,不过却能认得他们。

在明福坠楼处附近被欧打


西华尼申表示,他在6日凌晨也继续遭到10至15名官员以一样方式来折磨他,同样在20分钟无法忍受而晕倒,清早起来发现有一块冰在底裤里面。他也说,其脚板遭到毒打后,根本无法正常行走。

此外,西华尼申声称,一名官员也曾在5日下午3点15分至45分期间,曾经在14楼办公室的走廊处拳打脚踢和刮耳光长达20分钟。

他说,其他官员曾指副总监还在雪州反贪会办公室内来劝阻这名官员,不过后者却反称副总监昨晚已经同意他们施暴。

他也通过雪州反贪会办公室的照片认出这名官员殴打他的走廊处。哥宾星证实,这个走廊就是位于赵明福疑似坠楼的窗口处。

庭上出示破裂底裤来证明


哥宾星也向法庭提呈17张照片作为证据,包括受害者手脚、肚子和屁股的伤势。此外,西华尼申也在庭上出示当时身穿的白色底裤,前后都因为藤条的攻击而破裂。

西华尼申指出,本身是在9月9日释放后,於隔天拍摄身上的伤势照片。他也在伯父慕达雅的协助下整理了事发经过,并在9月11日报警,然后在指示下前往沙亚南诊所和巴生中央医院接受检查和治疗,长达4天。

他表示,本身在事发后首先是向人权组织——人民之声作出投报,然后陆续向警方、人权委员会和首相署副部长慕鲁基亚领导的公共投诉局作出投诉。

据他所了解,在这些政府机构当中,只有公共投诉局曾经针对其投诉作出调查。

要求警方解释为何没调查


哥宾星较后在休庭时强调,随着西华尼申揭露如此惊人的事实后,警方也应该解释他们为什么没有调查其投报。

验尸庭将在明日早上9点继续审讯,并预料会继续盘问西华尼申。

由于反贪会官员集体缺席今日的审讯,哥宾星也申请推事明日传召涉案的反贪会官员以供辩认。不过,推事最终只是允许辨认阿斯拉夫。

2009年9月4日星期五

霹雳州依然处在一个人民受损害的现况。

Media Statement by DAP Chairman of Perak, MP for Beruas and Senior Exco Pakat Rakyat Perak Dato Ngeh Koo Ham at Headquarter Perak, Ipoh

Perak State is in a stand still mode and the people suffer as a result. Call on the people to boycott Zambry and his exco for refusing to bow to the wishes of the people that the Perak State Legislative Assembly be dissolved and a fresh election called to resolve the present predicament


More than 6 months have elapsed since the immoral and unprincipled grab of power in Perak by Dato’ Seri Zambry Bin Abdul Kadir and his Exco members. The people of Perak is suffering as no serious investor would want to have a look at Perak due to the uncertainties created by Dato’ Seri Zambry and his BN power grabbers. Recent announcements that some investors are interested to invest in Perak are only eyewash to mislead the people. None of the projects is moving and investors remain at the interested to invest stage.The position of the Menteri Besar is still in doubt waiting for the final arbiter, the Federal Court to make a decision. Entangled together with the question as to who the legitimate Menteri Besar is, is the uncertainty of the local councilors and the village heads appointed by BN to replace the councilors and village heads appointed or elected under the Pakatan Rakyat Government. We hardly see anything moves in Perak as a result. BN is solely responsible for this state of affairs.

During the 10 months’ reign of Perak by Pakatan Rakyat under the able leadership of Dato Seri Nizar Bin Jamaluddin, people see positive changes sweeping through Perak which benefited them. During the short 10 months, scores of positive changes were made which benefited the people.

The people must end this present predicament and the way forward is to dissolve the State Legislative Assembly and allow a fresh election to be held. 90% of those surveyed (which includes both BN and PR supporters) wanted the State Legislative Assembly dissolved. We cannot allow Dato’ Seri Zambry Bin Abd Kadir to go against the wishes of the people. I call on the people to boycott Zambry and his exco members. All organizations and associations must stop inviting them to their functions to send a clear and strong message that we will not accept Zambry’s refusal to dissolve the State Legislative Assembly. Zambry from UMNO with his racist’s mind has said that I have called on the Chinese Associations not to invite him to their functions which is a lie. He tries again to play the racial card which is in vogue with UMNO leaders. My call is to all organizations and associations and to people of all races and religions to boycott him and his Exco members. The desire to see the Perak State Legislative Assembly dissolved to pave the way for a fresh election comes from people of all races and religions as the people is demanding back their democratic rights to chose their leaders to lead the state of Perak.


民主行动党霹雳州主席、木威区国会议员兼民联霹雳州高级行政议员拿督倪可汉于2009年8月20日,在怡保霹雳州总部发表文告:

霹雳州依然处在一个人民受损害的现况。呼吁人民杯葛赞比里及他的行政议员因其拒绝依附人民的意愿解散霹雳州议会重新选举,以便解决目前的窘境。


民联霹雳州政权被拿督斯里赞比里及其行政议员不道德及毫无原则地夺走至今已经超过6个月。霹雳州人民处在受损害的情况,因为拿督斯里赞比里及国阵的夺权者导致的不确定性,造成没有真诚的投资者愿意前来霹雳州进行投资。

最新的宣布指出,有一些投资者有兴趣在霹雳州进行投资只是为了误导人民的表面说辞,事实上并没有任何工程已经开始进行,投资者依然停留在观望的阶段。

州务大臣的地位依然未确定,仍然等待联邦法院仲裁作出最后的判决。在未知谁是真正合法的州务大臣的同时,国阵委任市议员及村长取代民联委任及选出的市议员及村长的做法也出现争议性。我们几乎看不见霹雳州有任何的改进。国阵是唯一必须为这些情况负责。

拿督斯里尼查领导的民联政府在执政的10个月内,让人民看见及感受到霹雳州许多正面及对人民有益的改变。在短短的10个月,有许多积极的政策改变真正惠及人民。

人民必须终止目前的困境,最好的方法就是解散州议会重新选举。根据民调,共有90%的人民(包括国阵及民联的支持者)要求解散州议会。我们不能允许拿督斯里赞比里违背人民的意愿。

我 呼吁人民杯葛赞比里及他的行政议员。所有组织及社团一定要停止邀请他们出席本身举办的活动,以便传达一个强烈及清楚的讯息,即我们不会接受赞比里表示拒绝 解散州议会的做法。来自巫统并拥有种族歧视的思维的赞比里曾说过我呼吁华人社团不邀请他们出席活动的说法是谎言。他再次使用巫统领袖惯用的种族伎俩。我的 呼吁是面向所有的组织、社团及人民,包括所有种族及宗教,全面杯葛赞比里及他的行政议员。

希望霹雳州议会解散并重新进行选举是来自各民族及宗教的人民心里最大的意愿,因为他们希望能重新取回民主的权利,选出他们心目中的领袖来领导霹雳州。

他也已经丧失了议长资格。

Media Statement by YB Dato’ Ngeh Koo Ham in Ipoh on 26th August 2009:

The Malaysian Bar Council Press Release confirms that Dato’ R. Ganesan was dishonest with regard to the time he ceased practice as a lawyer. Dato’ R. ganesan wrote to Bar Council only after V. Sivakumar’s lawyer notified him that even if he had been duly elected as Speaker (which he was not) he would also have been disqualified.

The Malaysian Bar Council Press Release confirms that Dato’ R. Ganesan has been dishonest when he said he ceased legal practice on 6/8/2009. It was obvious that he had fraudulently back dated his letter to the Bar Council.

The Bar Council had issued a letter to V. Sivakumar’s lawyer, Mr Chan Kok Keong informing him that Dato’ R. Ganesan was still in active practice as on 11/8/2009.

On 12/8/2009, Mr Chan Kok Keong served an affidavit containing the said confirmation on Dato’ R. Ganesan’s solicitors.

The Bar Council confirm that it was only on 13/8/2009, that they received a fax from Dato’ R. Ganesan a letter dated 6/8/2009 informing them that he has ceased practice as from 6/8/2009. It was obvious that Dato’ R. Ganesan had back dated his letter.

Only on 17/8/2009 that the Bar Council acknowledged receipt of Dato’ Ganesan’s back dated letter dated 6/8/2009 and his Notice of Cessation and Statutory Declaration dated 17/8/2009.

The spirit of Article XXX VIA (5) of the Perak Constitution is that the Speaker must cease his existing business or profession immediately and in any case not more than 3 months after his appointment as Speaker failing which he shall be disqualified.

While we never at any time recognize Dato’ R. Ganesan as lawfully elected, even if going by BN’s contention that he was lawfully elected (which he was not) he was disqualified as from 7/8/2009. Dato’ R. Ganesan cannot revive his Speaker post after disqualification by back dating his letter.

What is most disappointing is that we see dishonesty everywhere in BN. From Permatang Pasir candidate, Rohaizat Othman to the court appointed Perak Menteri Besar Dato’ Seri Zambry Bin Abdul Kadir and now to Dato’ R. Ganesan, they have been less than honest in their dealings and actions.

DATO’ NGEH KOO HAM

- Member of Parliament for Beruas

- Senior Exco Pakatan Rakyat Perak State Government

-------------------------

民联高级行政议员兼民主行动党霹雳州主席拿督倪可汉于2009826日,在怡保发表文告:

马来西亚律师公会发表的文告证实拿督甘尼申在何时终止律师职务一事的正确时间上不诚实,拿督甘尼申是在西华古玛揭发他之后才写信给律师公会。即使他是被合法地选为议长(其实他并没有),他也已经丧失了议长资格。

马来西亚律师公会的文告确认拿督甘尼申说他在200986终止律师职务的说法是不诚实,这很明显地显示他在写给律师公会的信函,日期已经回溯了较早的时候。

律师公会发给西华古玛的律师陈国强的信件中指明拿督甘尼申直至2009811日仍然是一名活跃的执业律师。

2009812日,陈国强律师提交宣誓书证实拿督甘尼申是一名执业律师。

律师公会已经证实在2009813日,他们才收到由拿督甘尼申传真的一封志期200986日的信件,通知律师公会他已经在200986日开始终止他本人的律师职务。这已经很明显地显示拿督甘尼申已经将他发给律师公会的信件日期回溯至较早的时候。

律师公会在2009817日才公认正式收到拿督甘尼申志期200986日的信函,同时他的终止通知法定声明日期是在2009817日。

霹雳州宪法第XXX VIA5条文是指议长在被选出后必须马上终止他原有的生意事业或职业,并且在任何情况下都不能超过3个月限期,若议长没有这么做,他将丧失议长资格。

我们从来没有承认拿督甘尼申是被合法选出的议长,即使国阵声明他是被合法选出(其实他并没有),他也将从200987日开始丧失议长资格。拿督甘尼申不能因为将他的信件日期回溯至较早时候就希望能恢复其议长资格。

最让我们感到失望的是,我们发现国阵充满了不诚实的行为。从峇东巴西补选候选人罗海扎失信被吊销律师执照,到法庭指拿督斯里赞比里是霹雳州务大臣,以及现在拿督甘尼申回溯信件日期,他们的种种行为都缺乏诚信。

针对国阵高级行政议员拿督哈米达今年四月宣布批准1万4000公顷土地给Rahman HydraulicTin 公司,赞比里必须对此事的真正情况作出解释。

Zambry must clarify the position of the 14,000 hec of land approved to Rahman Hydraulic Tin Bhd as announced by Dato’ Hamidah Osman, his Senior Exco i

Media Statement by Senior Exco Pakatan Rakyat Perak State Government, MP for Beruas YB Dato’ Ngeh Koo Ham at Pusat Khidmat DAP DUN Sitiwan, Sitiawan on Friday, 28th August 2009:

On 7/8/2009, Dato’ Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir accused me (Ngeh Koo Ham), YB Nga Kor Ming (MP for Taiping and PR Perak State Government Exco member) and YAB Datuk Seri Mohd Nizar Bin Jamaluddin (PR Perak Menteri Besar ) of spreading lies and accusing the BN State Government of approving 14,000 hec of land to Rahman Hydraulic Tin Bhd for Tin prospecting. The same was in fact announced by Dato’ Hamidah Osman, Zambry’s State Government Senior Exco member in April this year to be media. Zambry should clarify whether he is lying or Hamidah Osman is lying and both of them have a duty to the public to clarify the actual situation with regard to the approval of the said 14,000 hec of land.

Since my media statement on 12/8/2009 on this issue, Dato’ Seri Zambry has been exceptionally quiet on this matter. We at Pakatan Rakyat and the people of Perak demand from him transparency and he should clear the air on this issue immediately or we can presume that another scandal is brewing and will cause huge damage to the State of Perak and her people unless it is stopped now.

Dato’ Ngeh Koo Ham

-------------------------------------

民联霹雳州高级行政议员兼木威区国会议员拿督倪可汉于2009年8月28日,于实兆远民主行动党州议员服务中心发表文告:

针对国阵高级行政议员拿督哈米达今年四月宣布批准1万4000公顷土地给Rahman HydraulicTin 公司,赞比里必须对此事的真正情况作出解释。

在 2009年8月7日,拿督斯里赞比里控诉我(倪可汉)、倪可敏(太平区国会议员、民联霹雳州行政议员)及拿督斯里莫哈末尼查(民联霹雳州务大臣)散布谎 言,指责国阵州政府批准了1万4000公顷的土地给Rahman Hydraulic Tin 公司,以进行锡米的采矿探测。然而事实上,在今年4月份,赞比里政府的高级行政议员拿督哈米达就在媒体宣布国阵政府批准了上述土地。

赞比里必须解释,究竟是他还是哈米达在撒谎?他们有责任向公众交代事情的真正情况。

自 从我在2009年8月12日针对此事发表文告以来,拿督斯里赞比里却意外地保持沉默,回避这个问题。我们代表民联及所有霹雳州人民,向他提出透明施政的要 求,他必须马上作出清楚的交代。如不然,我们可以假设有更多的丑闻正在酝酿,并且会对霹雳州及霹雳州人民造成更大的破坏。

霹雳州人民并没有庆祝昨天的马来西亚国庆日

Media Statement by Senior Exco Pakatan Rakyat Perak State Government, MP for Beruas YB Dato’ Ngeh Koo Ham in Ipoh, on Tuesday, 1st September 2009:

The people of Perak did not celebrate Malaysia Independence day yesterday (31st August 2009) because they have been colonized again. We must regain our independence and the first step is to boycott the BN colonist.

In Perak though a State within the Federation of Malaysia, there was hardly any celebration of Malaysia Independence Day yesterday (31st August) and the days preceding it. This is understandable as the people of Perak had been colonized again i.e the imposition of the will of a group of people over the will of the general populace. This domination was enforced by force literally through the barrel of the gun. The BN party and the its leaders who have been rejected by the people of Perak used the police to enforce their dominance.

On 3 March 2009, we saw the police preventing Perak State elected representative from entering the State Assembly to attend a meeting convened by the lawful Speaker, YB V. Sivakumar.

Our 5 May 2009, we saw the police invading the State Assembly and forcibly removing the lawful Speaker and imprisoning him in a room.

On many other occasions we have also seen police preventing the lawful Speaker and his Privileges Committee members from operating or using the State Assembly facilities.

Police have also been used to arrest hundreds of people who protested against BN for trampling upon the democratic rights of the people of Perak. Many were arrested for wearing black shirts, holding candle light vigils, drinking black coffee and holding protest fasts.

BN the colonial master of Perak is running Perak like a police state.

The BN colonial master tried to create a semblance of Independence Day celebration by putting up flags at government buildings but people of Perak were in fact mourning the death of democracy in Perak.

According to surveys conducted by NTV 7, Merdeka Centre and others, about 90% of the people of Perak (supporters from both BN and PR) wants the State Legislative Assembly dissolved to pave way for a fresh election to resolve the present constitutional crisis. The will of the people must be respected.

I challenged the Prime Minister, Dato’ Seri Najib Tun Razak, as Chairman of BN and Dato’ Seri Zambry Abdul Kadir as BN chief in Perak to dissolve the Perak State Legislative Assembly if they truly subscribe to democratic principles. Otherwise, the people of Perak must continue to strive against this colonial Master until democracy is restored. The 1st step is to boycott the Perak BN State Government by not inviting Dato’ Seri Zambry and his exco members to any of our functions.

DATO’ NGEH KOO HAM

-------------------

霹雳州民联高级行政议员兼木威区国会议员拿督倪可汉于2009年9月1日在怡保发表文告:

霹雳州人民并没有庆祝昨天的马来西亚国庆日,因为他们被国阵被殖民统治,因此我们必须重新取回独立自主,第一个步骤即是杯葛国阵的殖民统治者。

霹雳州作为马来西亚联邦一份子,在国庆日当天及前夕,几乎没有任何庆祝活动。这是因为霹雳州人民被再次殖民,例如被霹雳州人民拒绝的国阵政党及其领袖使用警察来强行执行他们的统治,导致大多数的人民被一小撮人强迫接受他们的意愿。

在2009年3月3日,我们看见警察阻止霹雳州议员进入议会厅出席由合法议长西华古玛召开的州议会。

在2009年5月5日,我们看见警察侵入议会厅并强制地将合法议长拖离议会厅同时囚禁他。

还有许多的情况,我们看见警察阻止合法议长及其特权委员会成员进入州议会以召开会议或使用议会厅设施。

警察也被利用来逮捕许多反抗国阵践踏霹雳州人民的民主权益的人,还有逮捕许多穿黑衣、举行烛光会、喝黑咖啡及举行绝食活动的人。

国阵的殖民统治者已经将霹雳州变成警察国。

国阵的殖民统治者尝试以在政府建筑物张挂国旗作为全民庆祝国庆日的假象,然而霹雳州人民事实上却是在哀悼霹雳的民主死亡。

根据NTV7电视台、独立民调中心等,大约有90%的霹雳州人民(国阵及民联的支持者)要求霹雳州议会解散并重新选举,已解决目前的宪政危机。人民的意愿必须被尊重。

我挑战首相兼国阵主席拿督斯里纳吉及国阵霹雳州主席拿督斯里赞比里解散霹雳州议会,如果他们真正遵守民主的原则;否则,霹雳州人民将继续反抗殖民统治者直至民主被重新归还。第一步即是杯葛邀请霹雳州国阵政府拿督斯里赞比里及所有的行政议员出席任何的活动。

拿督倪可汉